It has a harsh high end and no body or warmth in the mid range. Crazy harsh high end frequency response that won't be solved with amateur EQing. As far as sound quality goes, both microphones sound almost identical. distorted and pain inducing! In frequency responses, the Rode NT1 is much flatter in comparison to the NT1A. Excellent package for the money. I love how the lowes sound lush and full and the highes are smooth without the harshness that some of my other mics have. The NT2-A carries on the tradition forged by the now legendary RØDE NT2. It sounds really good on male vocals and it's very smooth sounding without being harsh. But at the same time, its neutral tone is not for everyone. While that’s not much of a difference, it may be noticeable if you’re recording in a less-than-ideal acoustic space like a bedroom or home studio. Very good presence in the mid range, with a gentle 1K boost. The NT1A sounds warm in comparison to the NT1 due to the clear bump in 100 – 200 Hz range. and amped guitar+upright bass. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. I figured we could give the NT2-A a shot so we could exploit the figure-8 polar pattern. As we can see, these two mics have much in common. Excellent low frequency response, (I record church organ concerts,) and low noise. However, if raw accuracy is what you’re after, the Rode NT1 is hard to beat at this price point. It has an extremely well balanced frequency response, and has massively improved the sound of guitars, vocals, and drums in my recordings. I suggest spending a little more on a better mic like Neumann's but this is a great beginner's mic. This means they accept noise from the front and reject noise from the back. Lets dig in. The self noise of the NT1 is significantly lower than the NT2. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Rode NT1-A - Micrófono de Diafragma Grande para Estudios de Grabación, color Plateado. Also sound great on vocals. i have a bunch of tracks that were recorded with this mic and the sibilance ("S" sounds) are horrible! The p's and s's peaked alot. Rode NT2A is more feature-packed than Rode NT1A. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. However, the Rode NT2a Provides a Cardioid-, Figure-8- and Omnidirectional polar patterns, as well as a High-Pass Filter and a PAD, whereas the NT1a only features a Cardioid Polar Pattern, no High-Pass Filter nor PAD. This means that voices or sounds with a lower pitch or tone, such as rap vocals, will sound deeper and fuller with the Rode NT1A vs NT1. The NT1 is a great mic, and not just for the money. It’s part of what made the U87 a classic in the first place — it just works, a lot of the time. +24V Phantom power required from mixer or inteface, +48V Phantom power required from mixer or inteface, Large 1” capsule with gold plated diaphragm, Ultra low noise, self noise of only 5dB (A), Wide dynamic range, True condenser (externally biased), Internal capsule shock mounting, Includes RØDE SM6 shock mount, pop filter and dust cover, Large 1” HF1 gold sputtered capsule, On body control of polar pattern, HPF and PAD, Three position variable High-Pass Filter - Flat, 40Hz or 80Hz, Three position PAD - 0dB, -5dB or -10dB, Ultra low noise, Internal capsule shock mounting, Includes RØDE SM6 shock mount, pop filter and dust cover, 10 year extended warranty when you register your microphone, Sennheiser E604 Dynamic Cardioid for Snare and Toms, Shure 55SH Series II Dynamic Microphone (the Elvis Microphone), Shure PG58-XLR Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone, Sennheiser E835 Dynamic Cardioid Vocal Microphone, MXL R144 Ribbon Microphone with Shockmount, MXL 990 Blizzard Limited Edition Condenser Microphone, Rode VideoMic Pro Compact Shotgun Microphone, Rode VideoMic GO Lightweight On-Camera Mic, Sennheiser MD 46 Cardioid Interview Microphone, Rode Reporter Omnidirectional Dynamic Interview Microphone, Behringer B-2 PRO Dual-Diaphragm Condenser Microphone, Best Guitar Picks to Personalize Your Playing Style, Best Baby Book to Promote Intellectual Growth, Best Audio Interfaces for Transforming Your Music into Digital Records. The Max SPL for the NT2 is a bit lower than the NT1. The need to apply any effects or to do any background noise cleanup is completely gone - there simply is no background hum nor hiss of any kind as I've isolated properly from the noise of my PC fans. The NT2-A carries on the tradition forged by the now legendary RØDE NT2. I use it for acoustic guitar, vocals, mic'ing my amp, percussion etc. All You Need to Know, Ultimate Guide to the Best Thunderbolt Audio Interface. Rode NT1 vs NT1A Conclusion: Similarities & Differences, What is a Monitor Speaker? Onyx WordPress Theme by EckoThemes. And for the price, it is an absolute steal, fit for anyone's mic locker. The fidelity is awesome. I put this particular mic through a universal audio 610 Mk2, I must tell you the sound was astonishing. Its an OK mic.... i really hate it, but have heard worse. When people say its harsh, believe them. I am _extremely_ impressed with how well we could get clear vocals recorded in the same room as drums (without brushes!) The NT1 boasts an incredibly low self-noise of 4.5 dBA vs the NT1A, which has 5 dBA of self-noise. ­ All Rights Reserved. A professional large 1" capsule studio microphone incorporating three-position pick-up patterns, pad and high pass filter switches conveniently located on the mic body. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. I am a happy customer! It is a very accurate, rich, and balanced microphone. This mic seem to capture all the harmonics and I was very satisfied with the sound. The microphone has excellent range as well. It works fine on acoustic instruments such as a mandolin or acoustic guitar at distances of well over a meter with great clarity, almost as if a small diaphragm condenser microphone was used in conjunction with it. Condenser microphones require phantom power, so make sure you’ve considered where it’ll come from. The frequency response chart is what separates an amazing mic like Neumann, Telefunken, and AKG from the rest, and the Rode NT1-A has an average frequency response. The RØDE NT1-A 1" cardioid condenser microphone has become an industry standard; delivering the warmth, extended dynamic range, clarity and high SPL capability typically only featured on some of the world’s most expensive microphones. The NT1A also has a slightly higher max SPL (sound pressure level), coming in at 137 dBA vs the NT1s 132 dBA. Finalmente, para ir terminando esta comparativa entre Rode NT1-A y NT1.. It is an incredibly warm and surprisingly natural sounding mic. Any price and availability information displayed on https://www.amazon.com/ at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product. The NT2 is a dual diaphragm capsule since it supports both omni-directional and cardioid features. As the effect, though, Rode NT2A is also considerably heavier than Rode NT1A. This is a very versatile mic, and it sounds great to my ears. I'm not great at recordings so for a beginner who is kinda breaking his pockets to buy a mic in this price range I would look else where. Published with WordPress. Synaptic Sound was founded in April 2018 as an educational and informational resource for electronic music producers, DJs, and enthusiasts. At this point, we begin to see a slight and gradual rise  that will add to the presence of high-pitched noises. The Shock Mount is actually made very well and is a great improvement over the plastic ones Rode has shipped with their mics in the past. Synaptic Sound » Reviews & Buying Guides » Rode NT1 vs NT1A: Side-by-Side Comparison.