CP is a new model of community-based healthcare that is designed to use already existing EMS systems and personnel to enhance access to primary care and reduce overuse of EMS and costs. After action reports from the 2009/2010 H1N1 response indicate that local health departments face numerous legal hurdles in responding to health incidents including protection from legal liability, coordination and procurement of resources and response efforts among public and private actors, expansion of public health legal authority, and standards for credentialing volunteers. Many of the greatest public health successes in the United States are the result of legal or policy interventions, such as smoke-free air laws and mandatory seatbelt laws.1Yet many people may not be aware of the precise impact these interventions and approaches can have on population health. Some localities have implemented indoor smoking bans or local cigarette taxes effective in curbing tobacco usage and exposure. The report analyzes legal issues underlying the use of expanded EMS activities including authorizing deployment of EMS personnel, liability concerns, scope of practice, standard of care, venue restrictions, medical supervision requirements, and reimbursement. Building public health legal capacity at the local level is crucial for emergency preparedness planning and response. Our alumni are working in the health care and public health professions in public and private sector positions across the nation. NTLs are telephone hotlines staffed by Registered Nurses who can provide essential information, make initial assessments, and issue prescriptions for antiviral medications using established decision support tools. Many people find the difference between policy and law to be a confusing distinction. The Turning Point Act offers model public health legislative provisions based on best practices for state, local, and tribal governments seeking to revise or update their public health laws. Deliverables include case studies, typology briefs, legal scoping memoranda, and a preemption template tool. The end product is a locally-customizable training curriculum and exercise scenarios, instructor’s manual, training component summaries, and training videos. The center also hosts the Western Region Office of the Network for Public Health Law, supported primarily by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. PHLP houses the Network for Public Health Law – Western Region Office, which provides guidance and technical assistance within Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Washington. Uniform Emergency Volunteer Health Practitioners Act - Developed by the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) and completed in 2007, UEVHPA provides uniform legislative language to facilitate organized response efforts of volunteer health practitioners responding to public health emergencies. Some of our significant achievements include: The Network for Public Health Law builds relationships, delivers technical assistance, and provides training to lawyers, public health practitioners, and policy-makers on how to use law to improve the public's health. While preemption can be a positive tool for state or national uniformity on key laws or policies, it can also limit grassroots movements and evidence-based public health laws and policies. Principal investigator James G. Hodge, Jr. and his PHLP colleagues were tasked with providing assistance to states who are interested in adopting statutes or regulations that permit EPT as well as those who have already adopted these regulations but needed help implementing them. Uniform standards for public health practitioners conducting legal research, Essential online trainings about law and policy for all public health, Law and policy resources related to tribal public health, Inventories of state laws that establish pertussis and varicella vaccination requirements for healthcare workers and patients, Materials and resources on public health emergency legal preparedness such as MOUs, toolkits, and trainings, Publications and resources to assist in your public health law work, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Materials from a stakeholders meeting in March, 2012 in Atlanta regarding the larger project are available from NACCHO. It includes sample state legislative language, a discussion of selected issues related to practitioners’ liability, as well as general guidance concerning drafting and implementing legislation and regulations concerning EPT. HIAs use a flexible, data-driven approach that identifies the health consequences of new policies and develops practical strategies to enhance their health benefits and minimize adverse effects. The center brings students together with leading scholars, practitioners, and policymakers to address critical challenges at the intersection of law, ethics, policy, and the public’s health. The Healthy People 2020 Law and Health Policy project aims to help close that gap by showcasing evidence-based legal and policy interventions … The Association of the State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) with support from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), seeks to create innovative and realistic opportunities to include emergency medical services (EMS) providers into regular, everyday activities within a wide variety of communities throughout the nation. In 2013, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Healthcare Preparedness Activity (HPA) in collaboration with the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU)/Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) created a forum to discuss expanded EMS roles during a medical surge event. The Health Impact Project seeks to expand the use of HIAs in multiple sectors, including through environmental policy. We are reaching out to state and local governments, public health advocates and professionals, and public health lawyers to provide insight, information, and resources. The nationally-ranked health law programs, projects, and initiatives at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University encompass an array of unique and emerging areas, including public health law and policy, personalized medicine, and neuroscience. The Network is organized into 5 regions: Eastern, Mid-States, Northern, Southeastern and Western. Sponsored by the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) in collaboration with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, a project team led by James G. Hodge Jr., explored the legal and ethical environments related to mental and behavioral health before, during, and after declared emergencies that impact the public's health. This applies in healthcare and medicine more heavily than in some other industries, due to the heavily regulated nature of organizations that are concerned with public well-being in the United States. ASU Law is consistently ranked among the top 25 health law programs nationally for 9 years running by U.S. News and World Report; Host of the 2012 ASLME Health Law Professors Conference (which ASU Law will host again in June 2022); Western Region Office of the Network for Public Health Law, Network for Public Health Law – Western Region Office, Emergency Legal Preparedness and Response, Law Partnership Project: Five Essential Public Health Law Services - Preemption Project (2017), Temple University’s Center for Public Health Law Research, Expanding the Roles of Emergency Medical Services Providers: A Legal Analysis (2014), Association of the State and Territorial Health Officials, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Public Health Emergency Legal Preparedness Training Kit (2012), National Association of County & City Health Officials, Legal/Policy Toolkit for Adoption and Implementation of Expedited Partner (2011), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Integration of Health and Impact Assessments via Environmental Policy Acts (2016), Legal and Ethical Assessment of Mental and Behavioral Health Preparedness (2012), Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Potential Implications of CALIF v. City of Los Angeles for Mental and Behavioral Health Preparedness, Frequently Asked Questions about Legal Preparedness for Health Care Providers and Administrators, Public Health Officials, Emergency Planners, and Others Regarding Mental and Behavioral Health, Prescribing Authority During Declared Emergencies for Mental and Behavioral Health Care Providers, Sample Legal Guidance Letter - Liability for Mental Health Providers, Issue Brief: Substance Abuse Treatment, Emergencies, and the Law, Frequently Asked Questions on Ethical Issues Related to Mental Health Care in Emergencies, Mental Health Legal Preparedness and Crisis Standard of Care, Emergency Detention of Persons Deemed a Danger to Themselves or Others During a Public Health Emergency, Health Impact Assessments In Non-health Sectors (2012), Legal Review Concerning the Use of Health Impact Assessments in Non-health Sectors, Global Legal Triage and the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak (2009), Russian Republic of Buryatia State of Emergency Decree, Gujarat (India) Invocation of Epidemic Disease Act, Delhi (India) Invocation of Epidemic Disease Act, Haryana (India) Invocation of Epidemic Disease Act, Tamil Nadu (India) Invocation of Epidemic Disease Act, Maharashtra (India) Invocation of Epidemic Disease Act, Argentina Declaration of Nationwide Alert, Shandong Province (China) Declaration of Second-level Emergency, WHO Declaration of Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), President's Declaration of a National Emergency (PDF), Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act Declaration, U.S. State-Based Emergency Declarations Map (PDF), State of Illinois Proclamation of Public Health Emergency (PDF), State of Ohio Proclamation of Emergency (PDF), State of Wisconsin Declaration of Public Health Emergency, Flu.Gov Frequent Questions and Answers re: Declaration of National Emergency, Public Safety vs.